On Wednesday, British Prime Minister Theresa May failed to pass her Brexit deal. She was unable to stagger the strong rivals of EU divorce. Brexit has come to an end forever after the shortening of parliament’s bid to choose one alternative.
May told her conservative lawmakers that if Brexit deal gets passed by the parliament then it will help the party to win over eurosceptic rivals as well.
Some people have put their step back and even Northern Irish party said that it will again reject the deal.
In order to cut for the upcoming 3 years crisis, Brussels suggested delaying the divorce dates till 12th April. Whereas Britain was about to leave the block on Friday.
It is still uncertain whether the world’s fifth most powerful economy UK will leave the EU or not. Moreover, it is also unclear when and how the UK will leave the EU.
No other options are left rather than delaying departure date for the elections to deal with the economic shock.
To contrast the deadlock, the decision of indicative votes by the parliament wasn’t taken urgently.
None of the proposals get as satisfactory support from the majority lawmakers as May predicted. While some of them were in quite close alignment to the EU.
Conservative party’s deputy chairman James Cleverly tweeted, “In a spectacular display of indecision, the House of Commons has voted against remaining in the EU and every version of leaving the EU.”
Some proposals proceed really well then as compared to May’s deal. Moreover, to secure the majority, parliament is about to hold more indicative votes after rectifying other options.
Brexit Deal – NEW APPROACH:
Many conservative Eurosceptic specifies that they will only support May’s deal. If she decides to resign then there should be a new leader to sympathetically consider Britain’s future relations with the EU.
May in a Conservative party’s meeting told, “I have heard very clearly the mood of the parliamentary party.”
Just after May’s proposal, the Democratic Unionist party made their minority government. They said that if May again comes up with her proposal, they will definitely vote against it.
Democratic Unionist Party’s leader Arlene Foster said, “We’re in a situation where we cannot sign up to the Withdrawal Agreement”
On Friday, the government suggested bringing back the proposal. Whereas Speaker John Bercow did.’t allowed the third vote.
May has voted for to stay in the EU in the election of 2016 has now promised to step back before the 2022 elections. She was defeated two times by 230 votes and 149 votes on 15th January and 12th March respectively. Consequently, Britain will leave the EU political bodies, EU single market along with the customs union.
Many conservative rebels and DUP’s objecting “Irish Backstop,” said that it risks Britain to binding with EU for so many years.
Requisite Brexit Deal:
In the main Chamber, MPs were arguing over the other eight Brexit options including divorce revocation and leaving without any deal. In a meanwhile, May was addressing her lawmakers.
Notably, there was no majority for any option be it be May’s deal or something else such as departure date or UK wide customs union with EU.
Conservative former Cabinet minister Oliver Letwin said that all were hoping to have another chance on Monday as none will have an immediate majority.
After World War II, Brexit is the most important political and economic step of UK. But, its uncertainty has left investors and allies awestruck.
If May’s deal were passed then she would become the fourth conservative prime minister of its ages old party to solve the division issues. Previously, David Camron, John Major and Margaret Thatcher who fall foul of Europe’s division.
But, all this would happen if Britain would leave the European Union.
Some conservatives are saying that May herself is the reason behind all this chaos. Whereas, a lot of voters think that Brexit negotiation has been handled carelessly. Due to this, now staying with the EU can have a slight majority.
Conservative lawmaker Pauline Latham said, “It was inevitable and I just feel she’s made the right decision. She has actually read the mood of the party, which was a surprise.”
Pandemic motivating more parents to get their kids the flu shot, UBC study finds
VANCOUVER — A new study from the University of British Columbia suggests the COVID-19 pandemic may be motivating more parents to get their children a seasonal flu vaccine.
Published in the Journal of Pediatrics last week, the study surveyed 3,000 families from Canada, the United States, Japan, Israel, Spain and Switzerland.
The researchers found that 54 per cent of parents planned to vaccinate their children — up 16 percentage points from the previous year.
The study determined parents were more likely to get their child the flu shot if they thought there was potential for the child to catch COVID-19, and if their child was already up-to-date on other vaccinations.
Dr. Ran Goldman, the study’s lead author, notes that public health officials around the world are concerned about the potentially harmful combination of COVID-19 and flu season.
In a phone interview with The Canadian Press, Goldman says immunizing children will be “critical” in protecting the population from both infections.
He said his team was “very encouraged” by the results of the study, but still would like to see a slightly higher proportion of parents willing to give their children the flu shot.
Goldman said the magic threshold for a vaccine to be highly effective is about 70 per cent.
Although he believes that goal can be reached, Goldman said the media and the scientific community must work harder to help dispel myths and disinformation about vaccine use.
“Vaccination is the world’s greatest public health achievement,” Goldman said, stressing the impact vaccines have had on global mortality rates over the last century.
“If we reach 70 to 80 per cent of the population — not even 100 per cent — I’d be really thrilled.”
This report by The Canadian Press was first published August 13, 2020.
The Canadian Press
Crews prepare for strong winds as they battle fire, storm near Red Lake, Ont.
Firefighters and emergency workers prepared for a vicious storm while battling a massive wildfire on the doorstep of the northwestern Ontario community of Red Lake on Thursday.
The municipality has been almost entirely evacuated this week, with about 4,000 residents dispersed to numerous communities — the vast majority of them able to drive south along the highway.
But with the fire just two kilometres away and forecasters tracking a severe thunderstorm in the area, Red Lake Mayor Fred Mota said his community was bracing for the worst.
“Today the community is going to have some difficulties,” said Mota, noting the storm will bring with it much needed rain, but also lightning, nickel-sized hail and strong winds.
“The worrisome piece is that the wind gusts are going to be up to 110 kilometres per hour,” Mota said. “So we’ve got very, very strong wind gusts coming and that’s going to pose some challenges and difficulties for the firefighters.”
Jonathan Scott, a fire information officer with the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, said crews have made “great progress” on the fire, dubbed Red Lake 49, over the past two days.
As smoke dissipated Wednesday, investigators were able to get a better handle on its size, which is now 552 hectares, down from the earlier estimate of 750 hectares, Scott said.
“For today, winds will be out of the southeast and south, similar to yesterday, and it will put pressure on the northern flank, the head of the fire, the most active part and where we’re focusing most of our efforts,” he said.
Mota said officials have also spent time talking to residents about the COVID-19 pandemic, but noted there are currently no active cases in the entire northwest region, according to the local health unit.
“With the COVID-19, some people are very aware of it and we’re reminding people to remain socially distanced, to wear their face masks, to clean their hands regularly,” he said.
About 3,800 people have registered as having self-evacuated, according to the provincial Ministry of the Solicitor General, which is co-ordinating the relocation efforts.
He said 65 people were flown out of the area and the province has planes at the ready should they be needed.
Mota said about 100 residents remain in the Red Lake area, and most say they do not plan to leave their homes.
Chantal Cole-Fitzpatrick is among those who’ve stayed, although she is about 10 kilometres from the fire in nearby Balmertown, Ont., where she runs a pet store.
“If the power goes down, our fish will die, so we’ll stick around for them to start generators and that,” she said. “We’ll leave when we absolutely have to.”
In the meantime, Cole-Fitzpatrick and her family are doing their part to help out. They spent about 10 hours Wednesday looking after all the pets that were left behind by evacuees.
“There’s everything from turtles to hamsters, ferrets, chickens, pigeons, ducks — all kinds of animals,” she said.
“Lots of cats were left outside because the owners couldn’t find them in time, so we’ve been breaking into people’s houses and letting them in. As long as people need help, we’ll absolutely help them.”
Colin Hodgson said he was at a fly-in fishing lodge about 30 kilometres east of Red Lake on Monday night with his partner and some friends, when they spotted flames in the distance near his home in Balmertown.
Planes were grounded that day due to the smoke, but they were able to fly home on Tuesday.
“We got in our vehicle, ran home, grabbed our cats and whatever we could, just five minutes in the apartment and rushed out,” he said.
“We were worried we’d be trapped in, but the road was open.”
He, his partner and their kittens are now safe with family in Winnipeg.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 13, 2020.
Liam Casey, The Canadian Press
Common law partner of Nova Scotia mass shooter sues his estate for trauma, injuries
HALIFAX — The common law spouse of the man who carried out the mass shooting in Nova Scotia in mid-April is suing his estate, alleging he caused her to suffer psychological, physical and emotional injuries.
In a statement of claim filed Wednesday in Nova Scotia Supreme Court, the woman’s lawyer, Peter Rumscheidt, doesn’t provide a precise figure for the damages being claimed.
The woman says she was in a long-term relationship with Gabriel Wortman, a denturist based in Dartmouth, N.S., before he was killed by police after going on a shooting rampage April 18-19. Wortman had killed 22 people and set fire to a number of properties.
The former spouse says she and Wortman were together at his property in Portapique, N.S., on the night of April 18. She said she was the victim that night “of an assault and battery perpetrated against her by Mr. Wortman.”
She also says she was held against her will by Wortman and suffered from “intentional infliction of mental suffering.”
RCMP investigators have said the woman escaped into the woods on the night of April 18 and after taking refuge in a neighbour’s home, she spoke to police at about 6:30 a.m. on April 19 about her spouse owning a replica police vehicle and illegal firearms.
Wortman murdered 13 people in the coastal community about 40 kilometres west of Truro before escaping to kill nine others in several other Nova Scotia towns. He was finally shot and killed by police at a service station in Enfield, N.S., on the morning of April 19.
The woman has already renounced her right to be the executor of the will for Wortman’s estate, initially valued at more than $1.2 million, requesting it be administered by the public trustee.
In his will, the mass killer’s assets are listed as including six properties in Portapique and Halifax worth a total of $712,000 as well as $500,000 in personal belongings. The will was dated March 29, 2011, and is written on four pages.
The public trustee is responsible for paying the debts and outstanding taxes of the killer and is charged with providing a full inventory of assets within three months.
Truro lawyer Robert Pineo has said most family members of Wortman’s victims have already joined in an application to certify a class action to sue the estate for compensation for their losses and suffering as a result of the mass shooting.
Wortman had specified in his will that a “female companion/friend,” was to have full control over his funeral. He instructed that his body be wrapped in a Hudson’s Bay blanket and buried in a concrete vault at the cemetery in Portapique with no service or public notice of his death.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 13, 2020.
Michael Tutton, The Canadian Press
Feds create task force to help get Canadians home after Beirut blast
Cohen’s book foreword: Trump ‘wouldn’t mind if I was dead’
Freshii sees $525K net loss in second quarter amid COVID-19 pandemic
Russia registers virus vaccine, Putin’s daughter given it
Homicide, thefts, fraud: Alarming increases in brazen crime in Winnipeg
German economy plunged 10% during 2nd quarter amid pandemic
General News10 hours ago
US seizes digital currency accounts used by militant groups
Canada24 hours ago
Manitoba RCMP laughing after suspect mistakes unmarked police car for taxi
General News21 hours ago
US says Iran briefly seizes oil tanker near Strait of Hormuz
Canada17 hours ago
Gun buyback plan and Sarah Cooper gets Netflix special: In The News for Aug. 13
Opinion5 hours ago
SHEDDING SOME LIGHT ON THE DARK SCANDALOUS CAREER OF KAMALA HARRIS
General News10 hours ago
Facebook beefs up anti-misinfo efforts ahead of US election
General News21 hours ago
Lives Lost: Woman who performanced Shakespeare on the street
General News13 hours ago
Bob Woodward’s new Trump book, ‘Rage,’ due out next month